James Chukwuma Okoye, CSSP
The Eucharist in African Perspective*


In this article, Nigerian James Chukwuma Okoye explores the idea of an inculturated African Eucharist. After a discussion of the possibility of a truly African Eucharist according to Catholic teaching, Okoye outlines several elements that would need to be present in any Eucharist that would claim to be authentically African: it would be a sacrifice that would maintain the "ontological balance" between God and human beings; it would be richly communal in nature; it would function as an access to mystical power; it would have a healing role in the community; it would be a liturgy that would be celebrated in word, song, body movements and dance. Okoye then briefly discusses the Zairean rite of Eucharist as a concrete example of a eucharistic celebration that is rooted both in the Roman Rite as well as in local, African traditions

Introduction

The title of this article makes assertions which have not always gained the assent of all. One is that any matter of faith (here the Eucharist) can be understood and expressed differently across time and across cultures. Another is that an African way of looking at things exists. The first raises the question of the unity of faith in the diversity of expressions; the second that of the unity of humanity in the diversity of cultures. I here take up reflections begun in a paper in 1992 entitled, "The Eucharist and African Culture" (Okoye 1992).

Questions of Culture

Are Africans really so different from others? Are there characteristic traits which distinguish them from all others? Not long ago a missionary in Africa had this to say:

in an age of rapid translation, the mass diffusion of new books . . . it would be as bizarre to expect the growth of a characteristic African liturgy or theology as to expect the growth of English ones (Hastings 1967: 31).

The "bizarre" is actually in progress: elements of an African liturgy and theology are in process. Some doubters point to the increasing impact of globalization and internet culture: a global culture, it is affirmed, is not only setting the pace but is actually in the process of assimilating all cultures to that of Europe and the United States of America. Any programs based on a supposed African culture would be labor lost; what is more, it would be working against the insurmountable currents of civilization. It would be like returning Africa to the Dark Ages and snuffing out the light brought by colonization.
What is culture, and how resilient can it be in the face of the onslaught of "modernity"? Culture is not a reality on the ground: it is in the mind. It is constituted by lines of demarcation that the mind draws between peoples and groups. The mind may see all persons as similar (over against animals for instance); it then includes all persons in a species called humanity. When the mind chooses to concentrate on what is proper to each, it discovers not humanity but individuals, no two of whom on earth are ever the same. All human persons are thus somewhat similar and somewhat different. The mind may draw a line across peoples and discover Americans. Americans drink coffee, the British drink tea; Americans are warm, the British are cold. Americans play baseball and basketball, the British play cricket and soccer. Advertisers know how to exploit cultural sensitivities. Mazola oil is advertised in Britain as healthy, in America as full of flavour.
When the mind looks closer at Americans it finds Amerindians, African Americans, Anglo Americans, Hispanic Americans and others. It is the same with Africa. Depending on how the mind draws the line it will discover an African culture or African cultures Bantu culture, HamitoIslamic culture, Negroid culture and so on. What the mind attends to are worldviews and spontaneous explanations of reality, characteristic behaviors and institutions, elements of history and tradition, characteristic differences in material culture. All derive not from nature, but from nurture: culture is learned through socialization. An example from the socialization of children may help make the point. In the United States a parent would say to a child, "look me in the eye and tell me what happened". To avoid the parent's gaze would be to be caught in a lie. In most of Africa children do not fix their eyes on parents, nor young persons on elders; that would be gross disrespect, even challenge to authority. But an African born and bred in the United States would probably be socialized to look everyone in the eye, including elders. Traits taken in isolation do not make a culture; they must be viewed in concert with other traits and in context.
Are human beings then imprisoned in culture? How is understanding and communion between individuals and cultures possible? Difference is never absolute; there is always an element of sameness. Further, all share the same human quests of happiness, success, communion; all are affected by the same vital passions of joy and sadness, fear and hope. The configurations of these differ, however.
The presence of a trait in a culture does not mean that every person in that culture shares the trait. Some Americans actually prefer soccer to baseball or American football! The line of culture is the trend set by the dominant majority.
Culture is not static: Americans have continued to change since 1776. But just as a person retains identity while going through the life cycle, so culture retains a certain homogeneity through all its changes, unless it is violently altered, for example, through conquest, exile.
There are three levels of culture: material culture, institutions of society, and worldview. Material culture house, furniture, food, appliances is easily adaptable. Arab bedouins have integrated cell phones and computers into their desert tent lifestyle! Old habits are given up, new habits and skills are learned, but culture stretches itself to integrate these. Societal institutions are more resilient; for example, marriage and family mores, traditions of sickness and death. The constitution of the United States is one institution which is very significant for American culture; "amendments" keep it in line with changes in society. The worldview, which enshrines models of how the universe works, is at the deepest level of culture and is least amenable to change. An element of the American worldview is that all human persons are born equal and are subject to equal treatment. Another is that the individual is paramount.
As regards Africa, the seedbed of culture is village life. The African is fully a person in his/her village life. "Man is man in his village life … security, unconditional readiness to share, complete surrender of individuation" (Taylor 1963: 86). Even with the advent of urbanization, "home" is still the village. Some vital areas of life, like marriage and death, are governed by the customs and mores of the village. Rural populations still predominate in Africa: Malawi and Rwanda are 90% rural, Burundi is 95% and Tanzania 96% (Spearhead, 1984). Africans bring the village to the city; they live in the city from the worldviews of the village. There is western medicine and traditional medicine. There is divination even in the cities. In the 1970s Dar es Salaam had seven hundred full time diviners who were consulted daily by ten thousand people; more than half of these clients were worried about witchcraft (Shorter 1973: 41). In the city Africans create associations of people from the same home area for purposes of solidarity. That way they impose village values upon urban culture. The African worldview may even enlist aspects of Christianity and modernity! An example is how some African Initiative Churches have pressed the biblical psalms into service as alternatives for traditional charms. They group the psalms into protective, therapeutic and success psalms. For protection against fire disasters, soldiers, police officers and fire fighters read Psalm 60 with the name Jah; Psalm 35 defeats the evil plans of enemies, especially witches and evil men, when read in conjunction with other prayers between midnight and 3 AM in the open air while the reader is naked; for success in examinations choose Psalm 4 (Adamo 1999: 75, 76, 82).
There is no doubt that a global culture is being disseminated through western education, urbanization, the mass media, and especially the internet. The fact is, however, that some elements of this global culture are reinterpreted by the local culture: instead of a reduction into one, wI1at results are plural modernities colored by the various cultures (Schreiter 1997: 10 11). In some places local cultures have protected their values by regression to nativism. Indeed even in the First World itself, the globalizing process seems to have induced a search for identity through the revival or accentuation of cultural traits. The outflow of modernization curves back upon the West, creating multicultural societies in previously monocultural situations (Ibid. 13).

Culture and the Unity of Faith

There have always been diverse ways of celebrating the Eucharist; rather than hinder the unity of faith they give it vitality. Gregory the Great (540 604) declared: “in una fide, nil officit consuetudo diversa" (in the one faith there is no harm in diverse custom). Various Rites developed in the ancient patriarchates between the fourth and sixth centuries. The Roman Rite is only one among many rites, and is itself a particular example of inculturation. Others are the East Syrian and West Syrian (Jacobite, Maronite, Byzantine and Armenian), and the Alexandrian Rites (Coptic and Ethiopic). The Liturgy Constitution of Vatican II declared that:

in faithful obedience to tradition, … holy mother church holds all lawfully acknowledged rites to be of equal authority and dignity; that she wishes to preserve them in future and to foster them in every way (SC, 4).

In itself nothing prevents the emergence of an African Rite or even of other rites. There is the Coptic Rite in Egypt, the Ethiopic in Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Roman Rite came to the rest of Africa with the missionaries who established their own way of worship in what was then called the "missions." The church has always accepted that the Roman Rite may need adaptations in order to suit the genius of various peoples. At the Second Vatican Council the church declared:

even in the liturgy, the church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not involve the faith or the good of the whole community. Rather she respects and fosters the spiritual adornments and gifts of the various races and peoples (SC, 37).

On the first visit of any pope to Africa in 1969, Paul VI gave the go ahead to the emerging project of an African liturgy and theology when he declared at Kampala:

The expression, that is, the language and the mode of manifesting the one faith, may be manifold . . . . From this point of view a certain pluralism is not only legitimate but desirable. An adaptation of the Christian life in the fields of pastoral, ritual, didactic and spiritual activities is not only possible, it is even favored by the church. The liturgical renewal is a living example of this. And in this sense you may, and you must, have an African Christianity (Paul VI, 1969).

In 1994, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments issued guidelines for the adaptation of liturgy in a document, called The Roman Liturgy and Inculturation. It states that the aim of adaptation is in order that "the liturgy of the church must not be foreign to any country, people or individual, and at the same time it should transcend the particularity of race and nation" (Vatican 1994: # 18). Paragraph 40 of the SC states that "in some places and circumstances . . . an even more radical adaptation of the liturgy is needed, while the above mentioned document on the Roman liturgy and inculturation emphasizes that "adaptations of this kind do not envisage a transformation of the Roman Rite, but are made within the context of the Roman Rite" (Vatican 1994: #63).
The door is left open, however, for proposing "innovations" to the Holy See after an Episcopal Conference has exhausted all the possibilities of adaptation in the liturgical books and evaluated these adaptations.

Elements of Inculturation

Inculturation is genuine when texts and rites are so inserted into culture that they absorb its thought, language and ritual patterns; liturgical celebrations thus become cultural events. Neither liturgy, nor culture, is to impose alien meanings and patterns on the other (Chupungco, 1989: 29). There was a feeling among some missionaries that African culture had nothing to offer the faith. The contrary is the case. Actually traditional religion has been a force in the spread of Christianity; the core values of African religious culture are at bottom Christian. J. V. Taylor wrote that "the Christian understanding of man has far more in common with the solidarities of Africa than with the individualism of the western world" (Taylor 1963: 109). Furthermore, this religious culture continues to be the underlying support and term of reference for many African Christians.
Adaptation must respect certain principles of liturgy. Chupungco distinguishes the theological content from the liturgical form. The Eucharist is a sacrifice, but not every model of sacrifice is suitable for structuring it: the theological content of the Eucharist is that of Christ's paschal sacrifice, its liturgical form is that of a meal. Hence any adaptation of the Eucharist must have the recognizable form and structure of a meal. The Eucharist is essentially a prayer of praise (Eucharistein in Greek means to give thanks) over bread and wine, resembling the Jewish blessing (berakah), said over meals and especially over the Passover meal (Emminghaus, 1978: 20 23).
Jesus reinterpreted its meaning to refer to the liberation to be given in his death and resurrection. "Sacrifice" must be understood in a Christian manner as "a person's total self surrender to God represented in an exterior gift offering" (Jungmann, 1978: 99). With the words at the last supper Jesus laid down his life and announced his future sacrificial death; in the Eucharist, Christ re presents this offering, drawing the faithful into his one self offering. No church is free to use whatever symbols it likes; the symbols must relate to those arising from the very ministry of Christ. Hence the symbols of bread and wine in the Eucharist and the form of words said by Jesus at the last supper are irreplaceable. The Eucharist involves a meal in which eating is symbolic and sacramental (Emminghaus, 1978: 23).
Some theologians have argued that bread and wine simply mean "food and drink," and should be able to vary in different cultures. Jesus used the elements of food and drink available in his culture; the sacramental sign is not seen to inhere in the particular form of food and drink. In fact, it is questioned whether he actually used wheaten bread. Passover was the time of the barley harvest; the harvest of wheat did not usually come till about Pentecost. Traditional practice in the church has been to use wheaten bread and wine from grapes. Such materials native to the Mediterranean area cannot grow in many parts of the world. These theologians are seeking a way to make what the African eats "proximate matter" of the Eucharist (Okolo, 1978: 135; see also Uzukwu, 1980). Bishop Dupont of Pala (Chad) experimented with millet bread and wine between 1973 and 1975 before Rome stopped the experiment. But in a similar case there has been some change. Until 1971 the oil for consecration on Holy Thursday (used in baptism, confirmation, ordination and anointing of the sick) had to be olive oil; since then other oils have been allowed.

Elements of a Truly African Eucharist

In the African worldview sacrifice maintains an "ontological balance" between God and people, spirits and people, the departed and the living, which when upset leads to misfortune, sufferings and fear (Mbiti, 1969: 59). Africans are always conscious of their interaction with the invisible world. The standard interpretation of misfortune as given by diviners is some perturbation of the relationship with the unseen world of spirits and the "living dead." Africans understand the language of symbols and invest them with meaning. Africans share a unitary vision of life in which nature, humankind and the invisible world are linked in ongoing communion. An African Eucharist would need to strongly symbolize the active presence of God and of his Christ in the assembly.
The African is a communal being; his very identity is defined by multiple solidarities: "I am because we are, and since we are, therefore I am" (Ibid.: 108). A celebration is a communal event; it both expresses and builds up the community. There is no room for a Eucharist where everyone is saying his or her rosary, nor where each one worships on his/her own without concern for the needs of the brother or sister. In Africa, the Eucharistic presence of Christ in the species must relate to the assembly itself as a symbol of Christ's Eucharistic presence (Empereur, 1987: 44). As the bishops of Zaire (now Democratic Republic of the Congo) wrote, the Eucharist is a meeting with God and with one's brothers and sisters, allowing a new manner of conceiving the presence of God: in the fraternity among the faithful and their engagement in the world (Zaire, 1989a: 5) Communal celebration in union with God and with one another should be enhanced by the design of the church building. Such design should enhance communion with the Invisible and promote communal participation. Most African shrines are semi circular in shape and even in a forest grove the offerers so sit as to form a semi circle.
An African Eucharist could learn from the place of sacrificial meals in Africa, as illustrated from the sharing of the sacrificed bull among the Dinka of the Sudan. The bull represents the community in its various parts and its mutual obligations. The people are put together as a bull is put together. The various parts of the bull will revert to different sections of the community. Bringing the bull into the sphere of the invisible also binds them among themselves and with the living dead and the spirit world (Taylor 1963: 100 101). Where there has been hurt between people or the invisible beings have been offended, reconciliation must precede the sacrifice or is effected in the sacrifice itself. Sacrifice embodies the entire life of the community which it brings into the sphere and sanction of the invisible world. "For the African," writes Peter Sarpong, "life is one integral whole. There is an inseparable link between politics, economics, spirituality, morality and indeed every other aspect of life . . . . The African culture is a religious culture" (Sarpong, 1986: 4).
The African believes m mystical power. The universe is run or invisible mystical forces and powers. Some people — spirits, medicine men, witches, rain makers, priests — know how to access and control these powers (Mbiti, 1975: 165). In March 1968 five rain makers were jailed in Tanzania for causing too much rain (Mbiti, 1969: 180).
Disease in Africa is a religious matter; medicine is both physical and mystical (Ibid., 134, 170). "Guérir c'est retrouver l'harmonie perdue" (to be healed is to recover lost harmony) (de Rosny 1992: 129 130). Religious celebrations mediate harmony between people, and between them and the invisible powers. In this sense, the Eucharist must enhance the healing of individuals and of the community.
Salvation is not ethereal but concerns the human person in his/her total context. It is bodily and spiritual, social and psychological. The African does not wait for salvation after death; it must be evident even now in the circumstances of life. Hence, salvation is deliverance from the power of evil principalities and enclaves of human enemies, from ill health and misfortunes of life. It is wholeness and peace, the complete person in unity with God (Mbiti, 1986: 152). The blood of Christ did not just save me on the cross, it continues to protect and save me now.
Worship is expressed in word, song, body movements and dance; whole person worships. Colors speak: red for funerals among the Ashanti (Ghana). For certain rites the Igbo (East Nigeria) smeared themselves from head to toe with charcoal on the left side and white chalk on the right. This indicated a liminal state between human and divine worlds.
The Roman liturgy glories in rational symmetry; it appeals to the intellect. It eschews repetition. Africa is an oral culture which uses words for communicating feeling and beauty; repetition sustains and strengthens feelings. The Roman liturgy privileges doctrine; Africa privileges experience. Africans wish to experience God and God's power much more than to know God. The purpose of the homily of course is instruction, but much more does it play a vital role in bringing the African to the experience of the mystery. The complaint has become general that the training of the African clergy does not equip many of them with the skills for leading the community's prayer and delivering homilies that arouse and carry the experience of the congregation. A truly African Eucharist cannot dispense with such "masters of initiation" into the experience, and this may call for changes in the recruitment and training of ministers.

The Eucharist in African Perspective

An African Eucharist would incorporate most of the above values within the celebration. It would use African symbols and ways of worship to draw Africans more fully into the self giving of Christ to the Father and to his community. It would promote the solidarity of brothers and sisters in the one faith. It would unite their social and political living with the exigencies of their spiritual lives. Of course the Eucharist is not everything and must not become a panacea. Yet as a privileged moment of the life of the community it both expresses and builds the church, and thus impacts every aspect of the life of the community.
Efforts at inculturating the Eucharist are going on in various parts of Africa. The video cassette, The Dancing Church (Kane, 1991), gives slices of celebrations in Zambia and Zaire, Cameroon and Ashanti (Ghana). The Ndzon Melen Mass at St Paul's, Yaounde (Cameroon) is modeled on a reconciliation assembly in which questions are resolved and a common meal is partaken (See Abega 1978a and 1978b). In what follows I would like to concentrate on the Zairean Eucharist (Zaire 1989b; Mpongo 1978; Uzukwu 1985).
The project of the Zairean Mass was begun in 1969 and presented to Rome on 4 December 1973 as The Zairean Rite of Eucharistic Celebration; it was approved by the Congregation for Divine Worship on April 30, 1988 as the Roman Missal for the Dioceses of Zaire. Such a designation assured both its being within the Roman Rite and restricted in use to Zaire. Its influence has, however, spread; the opening Mass of the African Synod in Rome in April 1994 was an adaptation of it. The model is that of Palabre africaine (African palaver) in which listening and talking leads to reconciliation and communion. The priest is dressed in the robes and insignia of a chief. All servers are adult (male and female) and carry spears (the traditional guard of a chief). It is important to mention that the office of a chief in the tradition was not merely political; it was also spiritual and mystical. A role is created for an announcer, as at public functions. The celebrant with the servers dance in and circle the altar, which is venerated on all four sides by the priest with arms outstretched in a V-form. There is then the invocation of the saints and ancestors, who are ever present and guarantee family and community functions. The penitential rite is transferred until after the homily and creed (head slightly bowed, arms on chest). The congregation is sprinkled with holy water and peace is exchanged. During the General Intercessions a pot of incense is left burning. At the offertory representatives of the community dance in the gifts for the needy, saying:

"priest of God, here is our offering, may it be a true sign of our unity".

For the bread and wine, they say:

"O priest of God, here is bread, here is wine, gifts of God, fruits of the earth; they are also the work of man. May they become food and drink for the kingdom of God".

People echo and accompany the prayers by the priest with short responses; all raise hands with the priest at prayers. The congregation sits at the gospel. The Eucharistic prayer adapts the second Roman Eucharistic Prayer punctuated by responses of the congregation, for example, after the prayer for the dead, the response is "Seigneur, souviens toi d'eux tous" (Lord, remember them all).

Until He Comes Again

The above adaptations achieve conscious and full participation of all present. However, sometimes the focus may be so much on human confection that the invisible ministry of the Risen Christ may take a back seat. The effectiveness of traditional worship did not come from human confection, but from the gods who were acknowledged as present and active.
Some experience tension between, on the one hand, the sacrament as means of grace for the individual and his/her worship of God, and on the other hand, the communal dimension of the Eucharist. Have I come to worship and adore God or to express solidarity with my fellows? Do we have an altar or a table? In fact some accuse the present order of the Eucharist of reducing the altar of sacrifice to a table for a meal. They approach the presence of Christ in the Eucharistic species with adoration and dread, but ignore his equal presence in the Eucharistic assembly of the faithful. In a village in Nigeria, there was a chieftaincy dispute in a community, such that all relationship between the two sides in quarrel was banned. They did not buy from or sell to each other, nor would they ever eat together. Yet all came to church on Sundays, occupying different sides of the church. From its own angle each group went to "communion" and returned without ever having to meet the other group. There was not only no will for reconciliation but threats of violence, even in church! Each went to feed his/her soul oblivious of the traditional injunction to harmony. In traditional religion what they were doing would be an abomination! Didache 14:2 says, "let no one who has a quarrel with his neighbor join you until he is reconciled, lest your sacrifice be defiled".
The Eucharist in Africa has yet to impact Africa's divisions along language and culture lines. The Eucharistic assembly is in fact meant to be the communion of all peoples and classes; the Eucharist unites, it should never divide.
The demand to have Eucharist in one's vernacular is legitimate, but this should never be done without regard for the rights of others, and definitely must never lead to discrimination.
Finally, many of Africa's ills are certainly caused by the world economic order. Yet Africans are not guiltless; there are more wars and displacements of population in Africa than anywhere else, even in some very Catholic nations. Major wars are in progress in Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia and Eritrea, the Sudan, Liberia; serious conflicts are continuing in Namibia, Zaire, Chad, Somalia, Algeria, Rwanda. Perhaps things will really change when the Eucharist becomes an instrument of unity, according to the prayer in Didache 9:4: "as this broken bread was scattered on the mountains, but brought together was made one, so gather your church from the ends of the earth into your kingdom".

Notes

*James Chukwuma Okoye, CSSP, is Associate Professor of Old Testament at Catholic Theological Union in Chicago, Illinois, USA. He has served as provincial of his congregation in Nigeria, as a member of the Spiritan General Council in Rome, and as a peritus at the 1994 African Synod. This article was originally given as a paper at St. Lambert Parish, Chicago, IL, on May 4, 2000. Address: 5401 S. Cornell Avenue, Chicago, IL 60615 USA.

E mail: chukwuma@ctu.edu.

References Cited

Abega, P.
1978a "L'expérience liturgique de Ndzon Melen." Telema. 14: 41 50.
1978b "Liturgical Adaptation." In Fasholé Luke, ed. Pp. 597 605.

Adamo, David T.
1999 "African Cultural Hermeneutics." In R.S. Sugirtharajah, ed.
Vernacular Hermeneutics. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Chupungco, Anscar
1989 Liturgies of the Future: The Process and Methods of Inculturation. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

De Rosny, Eric
1992 L 'Afrique des Guérisons. Paris: Ed. Karthala. Emminghaus, J. H.
1978 The Eucharist: Essence, Form, Celebration. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.

Empereur, James
1987 Worship: Exploring the Sacred. Washington, D.C.: Pastoral Press.

Fasholé Luke, Edward W.
1978 Christianity in Independent Africa. London: R. Collings; Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Hastings, Adrian
1967 Church and Mission in Modern Africa. London: Burns and Oates.

Jungmann. J. A.
1978.The Mass: An Historical, Theological and Pastoral Survey, Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.

Kane, Thomas A.
1991 The Dancing Church. Videocassette. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

Mbiti, John
1986 Bible and Theology in African Christianity. Nairobi: OUP.
1975 Introduction to African Religion. London, Ibadan, Nairobi: Heineman.
1969 African Religions and Philosophy. London, Ibadan, Nairobi: Heinemann.

Mpongo, L.
1978 "Le rite zairois de la messe", Spiritus. 73: 436 441.

Okolo, Cukwudum Barnabas
1978. "Christ, Emmanuel: An African Inquiry". African Ecclesial Review. 20.3: 130 139.

Okoye, Chukwuma J.
1992 "The Eucharist and African Culture." African Ecclesial Review. 34: 272 292.

Paul VI
1969 "Closing Discourse to All Africa Symposium." In Shorter 1988: 20

Shorter, Alyward
1988 Toward a Theology of Inculturation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
1973 African Culture and the Christian Church. London: Geoffrey Chapman.

Sarpong, Peter K.
1986 "Everyday Spirituality." Ecumenical Review. 38. I (January): 4­ 11.

SC
1963 Vatican Council II. Sacrosanctarm Concilium. Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. In Walter M. Abbot, ed. The Documents of Vatican II. New York: Herder and Herder / Association Press, 1966, pp. 137 178.

Schreiter, Robert J.
1997 The New Catholicity: Theology between the Global and the Local. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Spearhead
1984 Pastoral Care of Youth in Rural Africa. 81. April.

Taylor, John V.
1963 Christian Presence amid African Religion. London: SCM.

Uzukwu, E.
1985 "Inculturation of the Eucharistic Celebration in Africa Today". African Christian Studies. 1: 13 27.
1980 "Food and Drink in Africa and the Christian Eucharist". African Ecclesial Review. 22: 370 385.

Vatican
1994 The Roman Liturgy and Inculturation (Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press). Zaire
1989a Conférence Episcopate du Zaire. Presentation de la Liturgie de la Messe. Kinshasa / Gombe, Zaire: Du Secrétariat Géneral.
1989b Conférence Episcopate du Zaire. Missel Romain pour les Diocese du Zaire. Kinshasa / Gombe: Editions du Sécrétariat Général


Ref.: Mission Studies, Vol. XIX, n. 2 38, 2002, pp. 159-173.