Thomas V. Kunnunkal, SJ
Leadership for Mission The Jesus Model


An expert educationist and administrator (St Xavier's Higher Secondary School, 4 Raj Nivas Marg, Delhi 110054 <kunnunkal@hotmail.com>) meditates on the Gospel picture of Jesus from the perspective of leadership theories taught and practiced in the business world. He finds in the teachings of Jesus many seeds of contemporary insights, and stresses the need of a Vision and Mission that are shared with all the members of the team. He is convinced that practicing the insights of Jesus would increase manifold the effectiveness of our apostolic works besides making them more transparent to God's Kingdom.

1. Some Questions

Without any titles or special education or official position or any external authority and as a layman (not of the tribe of Levi), how could Jesus be a leader? Could this ordinary young man of Nazareth exercise any worthwhile leadership, while divinity was veiled from him and had only the human resources available to him? Were Peter and Paul leaders? We say: of course. Why? Did Zacchaeus and Nicodemus become leaders after their encounter with Jesus? How? What about the countless men and women, on fire with a Vision and Mission, but without special titles, who accompany others towards a shared Vision and Mission and make a difference to life and living, though without much publicity? Are they real leaders? What is their secret? What are the substantial aspects of leadership? Who is a real leader?And who are the counterfeits?

2. Our Leadership Practices

In many of the Church‑related institutions, whether a school or a hospital or parish or a Province or a Diocese, the model of leadership that is in vogue is often authoritarian, with a large emphasis on commands and controls mixed with threats and punishments. This is done with the best of intentions, to improve the functioning of the institution. This has also been the earlier practice in vogue in business institutions, in order to increase productivity. Are we doing well? The easy answer is Yes. Is that the real answer? Do we have the courage to ask the students and teachers in school for an honest answer? Do we dare to ask the parishioners or hospital staff for their opinion? We must distinguish between two distinct functions: one administering and managing the details and routines of an institution (necessary, but can be delegated); the other function is a leadership that evolves a vision, makes it a shared vision and then makes it happen. This second is the essential part of true leadership. We often mistake good administration and management functions for good leadership. 

3. Some Myths about Leadership: The Illusion

(a) that the whole world consists of separate, unrelated forces and that I must work alone in that hostile, unfriendly situation, in my given responsibility; that the "enemy" is out there and so put all the blame on that enemy. As a result, I can remain safe and secure;

(b) that the essence of administration lies in being in charge and constantly taking action, actions and more actions, many of them reactive, in a stressed effort to keep everything under control, thinking that as a good administrator, I am also a good leader;

(c) that the core of leadership is all about planning, organizing and controlling, (I need to do all three, but I must go beyond. Leadership is in fact the opposite of managing, even though, as leader, I need to pay close attention to what is happening);

(d) that quality is a mere technique. (Actually, I do not realize that no matter how good, quality is much more than that);                       

            (e) that I can get things done from the outside, even when I am dealing with educated personnel as in a school or college, parish or other institution. Even though their door is locked from inside and I need to request them to open it, I hold on to my belief that I can smash my way in. (It may work for a time ‑ I may also find myself in jail);

            (f) that the important thing for me is to become totally involved in all the problems and situations that are happening without pausing to ask why they are happening in the first place;

            (g) that refusing to see current reality for what it is, or, worse still,  creating my own version of it, I change it;            

(h) that I am what my position is (Principal or Manager or Parish Priest, etc.), limiting my person and my vision to the four small walls of my present title and position and so not being able to perceive that I am much more than that.                       

(i) that I am conditioned by circumstances that actually obtain around me and so gradually settle into the status quo, saying: ‘What can I do? It is the bad situation outside'. I then live the parable of the boiled frog.

This is the story of a frog that a man wanted to train to tolerate hot water.   He first put the frog in a dish of hot water and the frog promptly jumped right out. So he put it in cool water and the frog was happily swimming about. A thermostat arrangement kept heating the water. At lukewarm water, the frog still felt good; later, as the temperature kept rising, there was some degree of discomfort, but still not too bad. Then, as the heat kept rising, the frog began to feel giddy, lost consciousness and finally when the water was boiling, the frog too got boiled.

If you are in an administrative position, take a second look at the nine items above and see how far your own practice of "leadership" conform to the above myths.

4. Modern Vision of Leadership in Current Literature

In recent decades, business has brought about radical re‑orientations in business practices, especially in its climate and relationship with its staff and client groups, mostly based on concrete research and data. Here are a few recent books that deal with leadership and the qualities needed for personal transformation: Light a Fire in your Heart, by Debashis Chatterjee, a world‑renowned author and teacher of leadership and personal transformation; A Passion for Excellence, by Tom Peters; Getting to Yes, an international best‑seller by Roger Fisher and Alan Sharp; Lateral Leadership ‑ Getting things done when you are not the Boss, by Roger Fisher and Alan Sharp; Principle‑Centred Leadership, by Stephen R Covey; First Things First, by Stephen R Covey and A Roger Merrill; The Fifth Discipline, by Peter M. Senge and The Power of Now ‑ A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment, by Eckhart Tolle.

5. The Jesus Paradigm of Leadership ‑ Its Evolution and Characteristics

Amazingly, much of what appears in current literature on how to exercise leadership is what we see in the life, action and approach of Jesus. After reading some of these books and reflecting on the Gospel I have written the following sketch of the qualities of Leadership for Mission that Jesus exercised.

(a) His spent thirty long years of preparation in Nazareth to equip himself for mission. One could have expected God to make a dramatic and high­ profile entry into our earth. He did not. It is important to remember that Jesus, though fully God and fully man, had only the human resources available to him while the divinity was veiled. This placed him in exactly the same conditions that we find ourselves. He did not take any divine shortcuts, but used the normal channels that were open to him as to everyone else. It is necessary to remember this, since often we make Jesus 99.79% divine and the rest human. A heresy? Certainly. We make a holy picture Jesus, but in history, he lived a very ordinary life, though in a most extraordinary way. He spent long years at Nazareth, seeing, listening, learning and becoming. What characterized these Nazareth          years? What did he learn that prepared him for his mission?  

(b) He came from a small lower middle class home; lived in a small village; he did not have the facility to go to a special school for education but learned to read and write from Mary and Joseph; they explained the meaning of the Word of God to him; he also listened to God's Word and the commentary in the synagogue and participated in the great festivals in the temple; he learned to work with his hands, and gained the skills of a carpenter; he learned from Mary how to pray and later spent long hours in personal prayer. Through his daily contact with people, listening to them, he came to know their condition, mindset and value systems; he noticed how those in authority (political or religious) exercised power, often abused their positions and used their status to gain personal advantages. It is essential for a leader is to know the current reality. The Nazareth years put Jesus in real contact with the society and people he would minister to (see Lk 3:39‑40).            

(c) A crucial turning point on his mission journey was the discovery of Yahweh‑God as his dear Father, his Abba‑experience. No more a God at whose sight you die, no more a God far away in heaven, but Yahweh    become a very dear Father Who remained with him, as an indwelling Spirit. He received the great insight that intimacy is redemptive, that God saves his people (all of them) in his fidelity, which in the Bible is referred to as his justice. God stands irrevocably faithful to God's commitment to people. There is no substitute for personal experience, no books, no talks or anything else. Jesus directly experienced his Abba‑Father calling him to mission. Much energy is packed inside a personal call. 

(d) He faced what are called the ‘messianic temptations. In fact these are the foundational temptations in life that we all go through, in one form or other. Through his spiritual discipline, Jesus became equipped to deal with the bread temptation of seeking instant satisfaction and  comfort; he was offered the lure of a big name and fame or the prestige temptation, but rejected it; and, most of all, he was able to deal with the greatest corrupter of people's morals, the power temptation. All this her did as a fully and truly human being, with the resources available to him as a human closely united to God. While a pilgrimon hearth his divinity was veiled from him. His silent years also helped him to internalize the three attitudinal requirements of consecration for mission: radical inner freedom, so that he did not cling to anything (being poor); radical concern for others so that there was no exclusion of any (being chaste); and radical availability to all (being obedient) and so he became a great instrument for God's mission.

(e) How does one discover one's vocation in life? Spirituality is the lens through which you see life and then decide. The hallmark of any authentic spirituality is its ability to remain in contact with the real contexts of life and then, after discernment, respond in a concrete fashion. Jesus discovered his mission through a prolonged appointment with his deeper and inner self and with God in the real contexts of his time, at the crossroads of a personal experience of current reality, on the one hand, and his own vision, desire and aspiration to contribute to life, on the other hand. There he gained insight into his own vocation and mission. In his long hours of prayer, he heard in the depth of his self the call from Yahweh‑God, his dear Abba.

(f) If intimacy with God is redemptive, then intimacy with others, whom his Abba loved so tenderly, is also redemptive. This was the logical connection that Jesus made. It became the heart of the Good News. Experts on leadership today constantly talk about developing good relationships for effectiveness, and mention the need of a covenant relationship between the organization and all its members, not just a contractual one. Trust is the cornerstone of this. This is the Japanese paradigm, that once you join our family (school or organization) you belong to it for life; that you agree to live together, that you will not exploit one another, but cooperate with one another and with the institution, to fully live. How beautifully Jesus demonstrated this in his ministry, by calling his disciples friends and companions, not slaves. From Genesis to Revelation, the first and last books, the Bible stresses God's close relationship with creation.

Entering into an intimate relation with others became Jesus' new way of     life. His vision was to restore the integrity of God's original creation. He was pained to see how much disintegration, disconnection and de-­alignment had taken place through human actions, ways of thinking and acting.  

(g) Jesus concretized his vision of building the Kingdom of God on earth into a mission for practical action. Transformation could only come through change of attitudes, relationships and actions by humans – by conversion. Since he found human society fragmented and divided, often heartless and without compassion, his mission was to rebuild human communities across the borders that separated them. He could easily perceive that borders, walls and prejudices made people less and less human and more and more uncaring. His difficult work was to restore the lost connection with God, with others, with nature and with self. It was          by fulfilling this sacred contract (his call to mission by Yahweh) that he served the Kingdom of God on earth. This was his one‑point agenda (Lk 4:43). Jesus did this by re‑building the diminishing Social Capital of social cohesion. There was great clarity in his mind about his vision and mission. The Synoptic Gospels mention of the Kingdom of God 116 times. 

(h) Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm. Jesus was an enthusiastic and passionate leader. There is great power in a vision and mission when it is internalized as one's calling in life, not just as a task or an imposed responsibility. Jesus was burning with desire for his mission (Lk 12:49‑50), it was his food and drink (Jn 4:34). Vision and mission a fire in the heart. Jesus would not rest till he carried them out. We do meet many uncommitted leaders. They sound like school children singing the Jana‑gang‑mana as if they are singing the funeral song of India. Jesus' vision also generated a great deal of courage for mission. He could stand unfazed before the powers of the world, never internally threatened.     

(i) His major responsibility as a leader was to be a steward and mission. This is what is often referred to both in Christian and business books, as servant leadership, namely total commitment to the mission or the organization. When vision and mission are shared, they generate great power. We also see in Jesus an admirable absence of any effort to boost or promote his own ego.          

(j) The focus in his leadership was to convert vision into mission by concretizing it into a practical programme of action that contributed to a transformation of attitudes and values. He disconnected leadership     from titles and positions and connected it firmly to mission. This called for a major paradigm shift then, as it does today. He firmly made leadership an inside job of building a shared vision, motivating and supporting his companions to work collaboratively for it. He got them say a firm Yes to that sacred call.        

(k) An original contribution of Jesus to leadership thought and practice was that he did not link leadership belongs to pre‑determined categories, like the élite, the educated, those with titles and high positions, etc. Instead through the choice and development of his leadership team he showed that the most ordinary persons can become true leaders. Look at the list of  those whom he chose to be leaders! If this was told in a story, people would call it fantasy! He patiently worked with them so that they recognized that their first and essential step was to develop personal mastery, or develop themselves before trying to develop others. They were first to control themselves by self‑discipline before trying to discipline others, which, in any case, can be done only in a tiny peripheral way, or for a short term. Rather, he made them deeply committed to the development of both self and others.             

(l) What was the approach that Jesus used for their inner transformation? Having presented his vision and mission of the Kingdom to them, explaining it through many parables and private conversations, he gave them space and time and thus created the climate for change and growth. The greater the internal space we occupy, the happier we are. He empowered them and made it possible for them to grow by providing them this free inner space. His action was often an accompanying action, supportive and forgiving. He called them his friends, not slaves. For him, first things came first and not second or third. Building up or developing others was his first priority as a leader.

(m) Modern leadership studies insist on delegation of responsibility with the power to take the needed decisions and execute. Jesus the leader delegated power and authority. He sent his disciples on mission, with minimum of external support but internally empowered and assured them that they could do what he did and in fact would do even greater things (Jn 14:12). This is true leadership. Providing space for others to grow and to execute, Jesus created seconds and thirds to carry his mission forward. Even Judas got his share of free space. From experience Jesus knew that synergy performs many miracles, that we will do more and do better, if we do things together. Hence he taught them to integrate rationality and intuition, head and heart, firmness and compassion, individual capabilities and the pooling of energies. Jesus the leader actually lived the modern paradigm of ‘managing from the left brain (planning, organizing, and measuring) and leading from the right brain'.

As a result, his disciples found that their percentage of performance was    not just 30 or 60, but 100, 200 or more. (Look at the apostolic times!)

(n) A beautiful quality of Jesus was that he remained in a learning mode. He also learned to delay gratification, the satisfaction that comes from achieving one's objectives. He was patient and waited for others to reap the fruits of what he had sown. 

            (o) A key in the strategy of Jesus was his focus on what happens inside a person. He was intensely keen about emotional development, namely development of the heart, of attitudes and values. He perceived that emotional development holds the key to a greater degree of leverage in life and in attaining one's own full potential, thus furthering a larger movement outside. True, the mind has its high place, but he knew that it is the heart that holds the key that opens most doors in life. So, his distinctive contribution was to introduce the inner or attitude revolution. He made leadership essentially an inside job, from where it could flow to the outside.

(p) Empathy, listening, communication, teaching, and accompanying are the means Jesus constantly used to instruct, energize and motivate. He was committed to develop a sense of ownership and belongingness among his disciples and so built up a tight team. As leader, his focus was on people and not on things. People first, things second. The disciples happily discovered that this created magic in the community. The same focus is found today in true leaders, especially in business. The children of this world seem to be smarter than those of the Kingdom!

(q) There is obviously a place for formality, for rules and norms; for rituals and ceremonials. But these come second and cannot be allowed to hijack the inner reality. With great inner freedom, Jesus demythologized religion and de‑ritualized it and made faith (not religion) the novel gift he brought. This too called for informality. Isn't true that insistence on mere efficiency is killing the humanity, Christian sense and spirituality of many institutional heads? Jesus was not afraid to get rid of mindless rules and long‑standing norms that had become out of date. It is delightful to see him engaged in de‑bureaucratizing what was held as sacred and untouchable, but was irrelevant, such as the many man‑made Sabbath rules (Lk 18:8).

(r) Jesus broke the paradigm that thinks that big is important and demonstrated that small is beautiful (Lk 21:1‑4). He saw that world transformation cannot bypass the majority people of the world. So he gave emotional, psychological and spiritual space and credit to everyone. He saw that his special charism and mission was to work with the ordinary people, the Janta, the poor of Yahweh, who then as now form the vast majority of the world population. They are the non persons, with no face, no name, no publicity, though they toil night and day ‑ without recognition. Jesus publicly proclaimed that he came to "save" these lost persons and give them a second life, make them be born again. Do not immediately think of eternal salvation, for his concern was more holistic and reality-based. His concern was to bring respect and dignity, love and peace to those women and men whom others despised and who discounted themselves as persons of no worth. The quest for these "lost persons" (the lost son, lost coin and lost sheep, in Lk 15, sometimes referred to as the good news of the Good News of Jesus) and their rehabilitation into the Kingdom community lay at the heart of his mission (Lk 4:18‑19).

(s) Many in administrative positions find it impossible to be leaders since they overcrowd their lives with routine management functions of daily work. They think: "Jesus was hard working and so are we. He went about doing good and so do we." Work has become addictive. Jesus showed how well he managed his priorities and so found time for all that was important. After a day's hard work, he would find time (long hours) to pray. People in need mattered to him and so he was available, during the day or at night. Unlike many of today's administrators, he was not afflicted by the ‘urgency disease'.

(t) Transparency, openness and integrity were virtues he insisted upon. How many secrets regarding his mission did Jesus keep away from his disciples (Jn 15:15)? Since he did not want to have manipulative control, there was no need for such secrecy. Instead, he put the accent on promoting a sense of belonging and building Social Capital, as a powerful transformative force. The Gospel calls it koinonia. What would happen to Government and civic life, if most of the present secrets were made transparent?

(u) As a leader Jesus was a model. He knew that action speaks much louder than words. His life was all first‑hand. Today too many lead second­ hand lives, practice others' values and become puppets on a string, or behave like the boiled frog in the parable. Jesus was fully an authentic person, with no gap between what he was and what he said and did. He lived the three key elements of the Kingdom spirituality. Koinonia, or communion, led him naturally to diakonia, or service, and the two together resulted in his becoming a martyrion, or witness and model. His disciples did the same and they transformed society and its people, as we read in Acts 4:32‑35.

(v) His desire to contribute to society kept Jesus' energy from self­-obsessive behaviour patterns and focused it towards something far greater than his self. Once he experienced that communion with God made the inexhaustible resources of the Spirit available to him, out of this experience of connectedness and abundance he could say so simply and with full assurance: "Your faith has healed you; go home in peace!" Though it surprised many of those present, he was not in the least surprised that it always happened. Fully human, Jesus never said: "I am not good enough". 

6. Conclusion

The paradigm of leadership that Jesus lived and taught is largely what business management schools have found to be of great advantage for greater productivity, and what they teach to managers who pay big money to learn, and then practice. If Church‑related institutional heads were to adopt this Jesus model of leadership, it would mean an increased performance, not just of 20‑30% but 100, 200 or even more. The reason: the new goal of ‘Making Everyone a Winner or Making Everyone a Leader' is fundamentally transformative and empowering. It is inclusive and so it is very energizing. When it happens within a group or an organization, it produces the miracle of synergy. Is it worthwhile?   Eminently so. We will  scarcely be able to recognize our transformed institutions.            

The challenge of Jesus as model of leadership continues today.

The call on consecrated leadership to respond also continues today.

 

Ref.:  VIDYAJYOTI, Vol. 68, n. 3, March 2004, pp. 167-176.